Tag Archives: faith

Anne Rice’s Dilemma

By Clark Goble | August 3, 2010

Anne Rice’s Dilemma

Approximately ten years ago, Anne Rice (the insanely popular author of The Vampire Chronicles and other books) publicly rededicated herself to the Catholicism of her youth. It was a big moment for Christians. Christians everywhere stumbled over one another to claim her as their teammate. There’s something encouraging for a Christian to be able to claim someone like Rice as a fellow believer. Rice’s popularity transcends race and religion. Her books are loved by people of all walks of life; so when she set aside her normal genres to begin writing fictional accounts of Christ’s life, Christians were thrilled.

Currently, Rice’s faith has again garnered some attention. The author recently announced on her Face Book page that she giving up Christianity in the name of Christ. Rarely does an author of Rice’s status engage her fan base in the way that Rice does. Her announcement was followed by several engaging dialogues between her and her readers. Basically, Rice’s position is while Christ is still the center of her life; she can no longer tolerate Christians themselves.

Rice has levied serious charges the Church. In her announcement, she claims that Christians are a “quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group.” Specifically, Rice is refusing to be associated with a church that is “anti-gay,” “anti-feminist”and“anti-artificial birth-control.”  In the comments that followed her announcement, Rice made it clear she wasn’t speaking of just the Catholic Church, but rather the global Church that includes Catholics and Protestants alike.

The reaction to Rice’s announcement has been mixed. Some Christians have responded with love and understanding and, quite frankly, others have responded in a way that seems to validate her point. Non-Christians have reacted much in the way Christians did ten years ago when Rice became a Christian – they have stumbled over themselves to rub it in the faces of all those Christians they know. In their opinions, Rice has put into words what they were thinking all along.

Does Rice Have a Point?

Does the Church deserve the charges that Rice has levied against it? Personally, I don’t think so. She is not the first person to make such charges against us and she certainly will not be the last. Outsiders have been quite vocal about the Church’s perceived hatred of homosexuals, women, and close-mindedness. My response is that outsiders are really in no position to make such generalizations. I’m a church insider. I have gone to church the vast majority of Sundays over the last ten years or so, I am pursuing a graduate degree at a conservative Christian college and seminary, I teach Sunday school and engage with Scripture on a level most people probably never will and I can attest to the fact that the charges Anne Rice has made (and others agree with) are not coherent with the reality I see on a day to day basis. It simply isn’t true that most Christians are close-minded, hate gay people or prefer weak, docile women. There are no secret meetings where we discuss our hatred for those who believe differently from us. In fact, most of the time we are far more concerned with how we can love people better. My point is, however, that those on the outside of the church (those who don’t spend their Sundays learning the Word and hanging out with Christians) aren’t in the position to pronounce such a judgment. In my line of work, my fellow employees and I are evaluated by our supervisors on a yearly basis; the most common complaint in response of these evaluations it that the supervisors spend very little time actually evaluating our performance. I’ve even been evaluated by supervisors I had never actually met prior to the evaluation! I wonder sometimes if these outsiders have made a genuine assessment of Christianity or if they are simply pronounce us all guilty based on a small sample.

Here’s the problem. Deserved or not, the perception is there. For most people, perception is reality. Also, if we are being honest, there are some Christians who are guilty as charged. Christians such as Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church may be in the minority, but they manage to make us all look bad. The Church needs to recognize and apologize for the hate that exudes from such people. In the face of such criticism, we need to love louder than ever before!

How should the Church respond?

  1. 1. With love: The Christians job on a day to day basis is to love the people that God created. Too often, we condemn the lifestyles of those outside the church without ever expressing our love for them. Scripture tells us to speak the truth in love (Eph. 4:15). I’m not suggesting we turn our backs on the truth of Scripture, but I am suggesting that far too often we overlook the love. Paul taught that the comfort of Christ was supposed to fill us up and overflow to others (2 Corinthians 1:4). More than anyone we should realize that, as sinners, none of us are saved except through the grace of God and the act of Christ on the cross. God’s offer of grace is extended to everyone – even those with lifestyles we don’t agree with. In most case, we should love now and preach later. Or better yet, leave the preaching up to those who are trained to do so. If we focus on love, the world will respond.

  1. 2. With Integrity: Last Sunday, my Bible study class explored the concept of integrity. Too often, charges of hypocrisy are warranted. We so quickly judge others yet fail to practice what we preach. Paul writes that we are to be the “Fragrance of Christ” among the saved and unsaved (2 Corinthians 2:14-17). In the same passage Paul writes about how God often puts His followers on display. This is a frightening concept for all of us who aren’t living as we should. How are unbelievers to respond if we don’t live as the Scriptures say we should? We should be aware at all times that we may be the only Christian someone knows as well as the only Bible they ever read. God puts us on display for these moments and it is in these moments we can shape a person’s perception of the Church. We need to strive at all times to exude the scent of Christ to a world that needs Him. Not just on Sundays and every other Wednesday … always.

  1. 3. With Knowledge: We need to study God’s Word. 1 Peter 3:15 tells us to always be ready to offer a defense of our faith to those who ask. Quite frankly, too many of us have no idea what the Bible says or even what we believe. We go to church for the entertainment, the prestige, or because our mothers told us we should. We need to learn what the Bible says. Not just in bits and pieces but as a complete narrative. We need to understand that the Bible tells a story of Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  We need to understand how our belief in Christ fits into this story. How can we ask any unbeliever to embrace the Word if we haven’t done it ourselves?

Basically, Rice’s accusations should serve as an impetus for a personal inventory. The Body of Christ needs to examine itself to see where we fall short. We should strive to walk closer to Christ than ever before. To some degree I can identify with what Rice is saying. When I was a new believer I boldly told people that while I followed Christ I did not consider myself a Christian. I was afraid to be associated with how the world perceived my religion. I didn’t want to be associated with the shortcomings and the failures of those Christians who had come before me. As I matured in my faith; however, I realized that if I walked away from those failures, I was walking away from an amazing story of redemption. In the midst of such human stupidity there are amazing examples of Christ-likeness within the body of His Church. It is edifying to be associated with such people as Mother Teresa, C.S. Lewis, Abraham Lincoln, and … well, I could create quite the list. My point is this – no Christian is perfect. The global Church certainly isn’t perfect. We have made many mistakes that the world often refuses to overlook. Who can blame them when they are simply mirroring the attitudes that far too often we display ourselves? If we want the world to take us seriously, we must love them as Christ loved them; we must extend His comfort, forgiveness, and love to a world that does not know Him. We must live with integrity and exude the scent of Christ everywhere we go. Finally, we must study His Word and know what it is we believe.

Maybe then, the Anne Rice’s of the world will feel comfortable calling themselves Christian.

TwitterWordPressFacebookMySpaceStumbleUponEmailGoogle GmailShare

Book Review: The Christian Atheist by Groeschel

By Clark Goble | June 24, 2010

Book Review: The Christian Atheist by Craig Groeschel
Publisher:
Zondervan, 2010

Author Craig Groeschel coins the term “Christian Atheist” to denote a believer who isn’t living his or her life in a way that exhibits that belief. Far from judgmental, this book is an exhortation for the reader to experience a fullness in their relationship with God. Groeschel uses several anecdotes from his own life to explore such weighty topics as shame, love, prayer, worry, and evangelism. Groeschel’s work reads almost like a biography documenting his own journey from Christian atheist to maturity in faith.

The goal for this book is to encourage the reader to strive for and embrace what Groescel refers to as “Third Line Faith.” Groeshell paints the picture of a Christian who crosses three separate lines on their road to spiritual maturity. The first line denotes a Christian who believes in the gospel of Christ just enough to benefit from it. The second line represents the Christian who has matured enough to have the desire to contribute to the Kingdom of God as long as it is comfortable to do so. The third and final line represents the Christian who believes so devoutly in the gospel of Christ that they are willing to give their entire life in service to it.

I don’t want to reveal too much because my hope is that you will read this book. I highly recommend it to all Christians who seek to grow and mature in their faith. Personally, I had a couple of “light-bulb” moments as I read this book; specifically when reading Groeschel’s chapters on forgiveness and worry. This book encompasses enough subjects that any believer who reads it should be able to identify their own obstacles on the road to spiritual maturity.

I’ll be adding this book to my list of highly recommended titles.

Clark

TwitterWordPressFacebookMySpaceStumbleUponEmailGoogle GmailShare

Profile of Discipleship: Joseph of Arimathaea

By Clark Goble | June 15, 2010

My last post introduced the concept of the “Perfect Disciple” and examined the idea that none of us really fit into that category. Instead, we are all imperfect and struggling to be a little more like Christ today than we were yesterday. One of the tools available for us is to study the lives of those disciples who came before us. This post will be the first in a series that I hope to contribute to every so often. The first disciple I have chosen to examine is Joseph of Arimathaea.

Who was Joseph of Arimathaea?

Joseph of Arimathaea (not to be confused with Joseph the husband of Mary) exists in stark contrast from the average disciple recorded in Scripture. Why? Joseph is depicted as a rich man (Mat 27:57). Rarely are the disciples depicted within the pages of Scripture recorded as being wealthy. In fact, Jesus Himself said that it was easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven (Mat 19:24). Because of the difficulties Joseph must have faced as a disciple, his life is worth examining. Extra-Biblical sources suggest that Joseph was a merchant who worked in the area of Briton. He is described in Scripture as being a good and righteous man (Luke 23:50). Joseph was so respected by his peers that he served as a member of the Sanhedrin (Mark 15:43). This court was the ultimate authority over the religious affairs of Israel and had the final authority in the interpretation of Mosaic Law. The court settled both civil and legal cases. Most likely due to his prominent position in the Sanhedrin, Joseph was a secret disciple of Jesus. He hadn’t revealed his allegiance to Christ out of fear of what the Jews might do to him (John 19:38). Perhaps as modern disciples of Christ, we can identify with Joseph’s predicament. Has there ever been a time when you were afraid to speak up for Christ because of the reception your might receive? What separates Joseph from the average disciple is that when he was needed the most, he stepped up to the plate.

Joseph’s Big Moment

Imagine what it must have been like for the disciples on the day Jesus was crucified. Christ’s followers must have been dazed and confused. As Jesus’ body hung lifeless from the cross, there must have been serious misgivings about what the apostles were going to do with the rest of their lives. Joseph of Arimathaea must have shared in this confusion. God had placed Joseph in a position; however, to do something no other follower of Christ could do – and Joseph did not disappoint.

The gospels tell us that up to this point Joseph had only followed Christ in secret. Fear of the repercussions had kept Joseph from declaring his loyalty to Christ publicly. In was in the bleak moment; however, that secrecy no longer mattered to Joseph. As the apostles and other followers of Christ returned home, most likely dejected and confused, Joseph could not stand seeing his Lord hanging dead on the cross. It was in this moment that Joseph went into action.

The Scriptures tell us that Joseph boldly went to Pilate and begged for the body of Christ (Mark 15:43 & Luke 23:52). Think about this for a second. A man who the day before was fearful to disclose his allegiance to Christ was boldly begging for his body. This mere though of a member of the Sanhedrin begging for the body of Christ must have been scandalous; there’s no way it was done in secret. Once Pilate relented and handed the body over, Joseph wrapped Christ’s body in clean linen and placed it in his own new tomb (Luke 23:50). This was a tomb that Joseph himself had labored to cut out of the rock (Mat 27:60 & Mark 15:46). Once he was finished, Joseph went away.

Joseph’s act was born purely out of love for Christ. He must not have understood that Christ would return after three days (even the apostles closest to Christ didn’t understand this). Joseph wrapped Christ’s body in a clean linen because he thought he was dead and gone – forever. He wasn’t trying to score points with the risen Lord because he didn’t know his Lord was going to rise … he simply acted in service to one that he deeply loved.

Joseph sacrificed his own tomb, labor, money, and reputation for his Lord. In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus tells a rich man that he must be willing to give up all that he had to follow Christ and thus enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Is there a better example of this in practice than what Joseph did for his fallen Lord? Joseph truly was willing to give up everything. How many hours must it have taken Joseph to cut a tomb out of solid rock? How much did the tomb cost? Only the very rich were afforded such resting places. Joseph sacrificed his reputation (and most likely his standing on the Sanhedrin) and even gave up his own eternal resting place for Christ. He was truly ready to give up everything to follow his Lord; even in death.

Joseph’s actions are so inspiring; especially in light of the fact that he was the only one that could accomplish what he did. He had the correct combination of wealth, reputation, and standing to boldly demand a meeting with Pilate and then fund the burial. He even had a freshly cut tomb! God was using Joseph to play an integral role in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ … and Joseph rose up to meet the call!

How much easier would it have been for Joseph to simply leave and move on with his life. No one would have ever know that he had followed Christ. I wonder what I would have done in the same situation.

What would you have done?

Joseph of Arimathaea provides Christ’s followers with a stunning example of discipleship in action. He allowed his faith in Christ to move him and was even willing to give up all his earthly treasures. It was an act that surely led to his reward in Heaven.

- Clark

TwitterWordPressFacebookMySpaceStumbleUponEmailGoogle GmailShare

Book Review: A New Kind of Christianity by Brian McLaren

By Clark Goble | May 8, 2010

Book Review: A New Kind of Christianity by Brian McLaren
Publisher: HarperOne, 2010

In past reviews of Brian McLaren’s books I have always attempted to hold my criticism back a little. This is due in large part to not wanting to harshly judge a fellow Christian in a public forum. After reading A New Kind Christianity I am no longer concerned with holding back. I suppose this is because McLaren is also no longer concerned with holding back. In the past, McLaren has always been hard to pin down.  His opinions are vague because he will never make a claim of truth in what he writes. He has said that what he writes is merely a contribution to the ongoing “conversation” we humans are invited to engage in about God and seems to think that the moment someone claims an actual truth regarding God the conversation is muffled. The problem is that McLaren seems to apply his relativist outlook to the rock solid truths of the Bible leaving us all swimming around in a sea of uncertainty.

In A New Kind of Christianity McLaren comes as close as he ever has to showing his cards. In this book he denies hell, the fall of man, human depravity, and seems to think the greatest Christian minds throughout history have all been reading the Bible in the wrong way. McLaren submits that for millennia Christians have been reading the Bible through a faulty Greco-Roman world view. He claims that this worldview has led us all to come to fundamentally wrong conclusions concerning Jesus’ role in our lives. Thank goodness McLaren has come along to save us from the false teachings of the greatest minds the world has ever known. While McLaren doesn’t explicitly state it, if he is correct concerning the things he writes, than the likes of the apostle Paul, Saint Augustine, Martin Luther, John Calvin, and C.S. Lewis have all been wrong. McLaren’s claims reek of arrogance.

Rather than reading the Bible through our faulty Greco-Roman reading glasses (according to the author, these glasses lead us to read the Bible as a constitution that reveals too much truth), McLaren suggest we should read it as an ongoing conversation. The most attracting aspect of this “conversation” is no doubt that it will never lead us to a certain or definite conclusion. What McClaren has done is invent a new way to read Scripture due to his inability to juxtapose the God of the Old Testament with the Savior of the New Testament. McLaren submits that the Bible is evidence of the evolution of mankind’s thought processes. In the Old Testament, when man’s thoughts were the most primitive, God was painted as a violent and cruel God that no savvy Christian such as McLaren could ever worship. After a few thousand years, Jesus was portrayed in a much different light because thought had evolved to the point that mankind could imagine a God that was closer to the truth. McLaren takes this theory far enough to imagine a future where Christians will imagine a God that is even more perfect than Christ. In his future, Christians (and God) are vegetarian, earth worshiping pacifists who throw up in their mouth a little when they remember those barbaric Christians who laid the foundation of the church. It seemed to me that McLaren’s God of the future is very much like McLaren himself. McLaren’s book is one of the grossest forms of idolatry I have ever witnessed another Christian commit. Because he is unable (or unwilling) to accept God as He is revealed to us in Scripture, McLaren resorts to recreating Him in his own image. It is the ultimate form of humanism and arrogance.

Personally, I’ll join the early church fathers and fundamental Christians over the last two millennia who wished to understand the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as revealed by God Himself in the Holy Scriptures. McLaren’s teaching in this book are so far removed from traditional fundamental Christianity that it is virtually indistinguishable from atheism.

Christ taught that the world would hate us because of Him. This was evidenced in the church fathers who gave their lives to promote the Gospel. It is witnessed to today in various parts of the world where Christians are persecuted and killed for their beliefs.

In this book, McLaren spits on the memories and sacrifices of those Christians and sides with the world. He disregards the revelation of God Almighty and creates a disgusting idol.

TwitterWordPressFacebookMySpaceStumbleUponEmailGoogle GmailShare

In the Line of Fire: Should Women Act as Pastors Within the Church?

By Clark Goble | May 5, 2010

Should Women be Pastors or Teachers in the Church?

Introduction

Please allow me to begin by reassuring the reader that I understand this is a controversial subject. I have a wife and three daughters and am fully aware of how this issue affects them. I understand that this subject has been used and abused at times in an effort to subject women. I apologize for those moments. I also understand that the Bible’s teaching concerning this subject has often been misunderstood. Because of the potential pot-holes, I will do my best to present a Biblical view on this subject in as sensitive a manner as possible.

Last Sunday I watched my pastor step up and defend the Scriptures as they relate to the subject of women pastors. The church I attend is Southern Baptist whose view is that women should not preach, teach, or hold authority over any man within the church. I myself had remained neutral on the subject for several years. My neutrality was due in part to a fear of insulting the females in my life whom I love dearly. I knew what the Bible said but I wasn’t sure how to fit the pieces of the puzzle together in a way that wouldn’t hurt feelings. In retrospect, I believe I lacked a wide enough point of view. You see, when put in the context of the Bible as a whole, there is nothing hurtful about the Southern Baptist position on the subject.

On the way home from church Sunday I had a bit of an “ah ha” moment as my thoughts began to crystallize on this issue. My line of reasoning began as I watched my pastor preach and thought to myself, “I would never want my wife to face the kind of pressure he is facing today.”

This subject is difficult because we inherently understand that all men and women are created equal. It is understood that in this day and age women can be anything they want to be. The contradiction seems evident – if women are equal to men, why can’t they aspire to preach? Is the Bible somehow outdated or irrelevant to the lives of the modern woman? For a moment, let’s dismiss our preconceived notions and study the Scriptures to see what they have to say.

I pray that my readers read what I have written here with an open heart and receive it in manner in which it is intended. I would recommend that as you read this post you get out your Bible and study along with me.

Are men and women really created equal?

  • Genesis 1:27 – Both men and women are created in God’s image.
  • Galatians 3:28 – There is no male or female – all are one (equal) in Christ.

According to Scripture, women are equal to men and are created in the image of God. If this is true, it seems to contradict Paul’s teaching in the following verses.

  • 1 Timothy 2:11-12 – A woman should learn in silence and not have authority over or teach a man.
  • 1 Corinthians 14:34 – A woman should be silent.
  • 1 Corinthians 11:3 – Christ is the head of every man and man is the head every of women. God is the head of Christ.

These verses seem to stand in stark contrast to each other. The Bible clearly teaches that men and women are equal, however, women should not preach to, teach, or hold authority over a man in the church. Despite their equality, men and women have different roles. Consider the following verses:

  • Ephesians 5:22-23 – Wives are to submit to their husbands as to the Lord. The husbands are the head of the wives as Christ is the head of the church.
  • Ephesians 5:25 – Husbands are to love their wives just as Christ loved the church.
  • Ephesians 5:32 – Men are to love their wives and wives are to respect their husbands.

Obviously, women are special to God and hold a special place and role within the Kingdom. Consider that it was to a woman that Christ first revealed that He was God (John 4:26). It was to women that Christ first presented Himself to after the resurrection (Matthew 28:9-10). There are examples of woman prophets throughout the Old and New Testaments (Exodus 15:20, Judges 4:4, 2 Kings 22:14, Isaiah 8:13). These instances clearly show that if God chooses to use a woman to speak His Word, she had better heed His call. However, these examples all seem to be outside of a church setting. It is worth noting that there are no Scriptural examples of a woman acting as pastor within the ministry that is an ongoing church.

It seems to me that Ephesians 5:25 has huge implications on our topic. If a man is to love his wife as Christ loved the church, what does that mean? How did Christ love the church? Did he instruct each one of us to be crucified? Did he tell us to die for Him? No. He died for us willingly on the cross! He loved us that much! This means that a man should follow Christ’s example and be willing to die for his wife. I named this study ‘In the Line of Fire’ because I am reminded of the Secret Service agents who willingly protect the President with their lives. They are willing to take a bullet not because they are more equipped to do so than the President, but because they view his life as more important than their own. Keep this attitude in mind as we move forward in our study. According to Ephesians 5:25, a husband must view his wife’s life as more important than his own (just as the Secret Service agent views the President). He must be willing to take a bullet for her! Furthermore, he should be willing to follow Christ’s example and position himself between her and the gates of hell! If he is unwilling to do this, he is not fulfilling his Biblical role as husband.

Within the Church it is the Pastors who are in the Line of Fire

  • Luke 12:48 – Much is required of everyone who is given much. Even more will be expected of those who have been entrusted with more.

Pastors have been entrusted with shepherding a flock made up of people that Christ loves. They have been given the duty to teach the Word of God to people made in His image. It is a great responsibility! Pastors will be expected to maintain a higher standard by both God and man!

  • James 3:1 – Teachers (of the Word) will receive a stricter judgment than others. As such, not many should do it!

James is actually trying to talk people out of becoming teachers of the Word because of the target that is on their backs. Preachers are held to a higher standard and will receive a stricter judgment than anyone else. They are in the line of fire! As such, any man who takes his God given responsibility as a husband to love his wife as Christ loved the church should be willing to step into the line of fire and live by a higher standard and take on the stricter judgment rather than expecting his wife to do it! Allowing his wife to fill the role of pastor is akin to Christ asking us to die on the cross.

In Paul’s day the leaders of the church faced certain death for their beliefs. This is true in parts of the world even today. Stand up and pastor a church in China or Iran and you can expect nothing but hardship and probable death. We have been spoiled in our western culture to the point that we have forgotten how dangerous it can be to preach to Word! Christ Himself said that they will hate us because of Him!

It isn’t that women aren’t capable of being pastors or teaching the word. They aren’t somehow inferior to men. Rather, it is that men should love their wives enough not to allow them to withstand the scrutiny, expectations, retaliation, and judgment associated with the position. The role of pastor is a tough, stressful and dangerous. It should be the man taking the heat and positioning himself between his wife and the gates of hell. Why? Because women are simply that special! They should be placed on a pedestal rather than in a pulpit dodging bullets!

How do we respond to men who reject this teaching?

If you are a man who would rather his wife takes the heat associated with leadership in the church I would strongly suggest that you man-up! God has clearly told you in His Word that your instinct should be to love your wife like Christ loved the church. If you are content to watch her take the heat in the pulpit as pastor or deacon how can she be sure you will take a literal bullet for her? How would you react if the enemy was about to kill her for preaching the Word? How is she supposed to feel loved if you aren’t willing to step up to the plate and assume your role as the head of the church?

What about women who reject this teaching?

I understand there will be women who stand up and say they don’t need any man to open a door, take a bullet, or preach a sermon for them. They are right. They don’t need a man to do these things. They are more than capable of taking a bullet. I would strongly suspect however that a woman who is unwilling or not ready to accept a man’s protection and sacrifice is not fully prepared to accept Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. I would humbly suggest she re-evaluate her position on this issue. If a woman still can’t accept what the Bible says on this matter, there are denominations and churches out there that will accommodate. I’m not suggesting that a woman pastor is going to hell because of their opinion on this issue. I am suggesting, however, that their husbands should prayerfully examine the issue with some attention to the details.

God Bless!

TwitterWordPressFacebookMySpaceStumbleUponEmailGoogle GmailShare